In common law jurisdiction (and in ancient societies) king can do no wrong concept was prevalent. With the idea of rule of law it became clear that even king is not above law. Some enactments do acknowledge this fact. for ex -in New Zealand Bail Act 2000 section 4 says: This Act binds the Crown.
Does this mean Crown may not be bound by some Act?
Does this mean Crown may not be bound by some Act?
No comments:
Post a Comment